Hikaru on Twitter

  • You might not become a grandmaster, but you can at least get some crispy fries while you’re at it. Newb School open… https://t.co/2Y4bG4Wczf
  • Early and packed schedule this week! Live on ♛ https://t.co/qFDclUL54n https://t.co/tbGt7tbGgE
  • @justinkan I'm in good shape too! :)
  • Yay, Earthquake!
  • Thanks to @Krikorsm for the invite to play on the Brazil Capybaras for the Pro Chess League on @chesscom! I'm very… https://t.co/mszwJh9Szg
  • Read By Category


    Gjovik Rapid Aker Challenge Day 1

    January 03, 2009 • General

    Hello to everyone. As I have just finished my preparation for today’s second round games, I will take this opportunity to make a few brief remarks about my two games yesterday. In the first game I was black against GM Peter Svidler. Surprisingly, we have only played once despite crossing paths at several different paths. In that game back in 2002 i(wow have 6 1/2 years really gone by that quickly?) n the Dominican Republic. In that game I was black and made the ill-advised choice of the Najdorf and got crushed by a very strong novelty. This time around, I made a much better opening choice by playing the Caro Kann. Peter surprised me with the interesting 8.Na3!? After a couple of moves I obtained a very nice position and was equal until I blundered badly with 14…a6? If I had simply played Bc5, I probably would have been able to draw with relative ease. Alas, after the very strong 15.c4 I went astray quickly and lost horribly.

    In the second game I had white against Kjetil Lie who is coming off a phenomenal performance in the Olympiad. In this game, I chose to play an unsound pawn sacrifice with the very early a3-b4 in the English. The one other time I played this variation (Nakamura-Wojtkiewicz, 2004) the gambit was declined. However, this time around Kjetil (I cannot pronounce the name remotely near how it is supposed to sound) showed no fear and grabbed the pawn. I suspect that at some point he was quite a bit better, but due to a shortage of time and uncertainty as to whether to play for a win or a draw he played a little too passively and fell victim of a very powerful attack after 19.d4 Bxd4 20.Nd5. I have yet to analyze this position with rybka, but it is definitely difficult to play if you are A)short of time and B)not a computer. Objectively, I am sure that there is an adequate defense and Black is winning, but it seemed like the right idea considering the circumstances. Kjetil was unable to find this defense and lost to my very strong kingside attack.

    So going into the second day, I currently have 1/2. Overall, it was not the score I was hoping for, but that is life. I suspect that what irks me more about it is that 1 move is really the only difference between the desired result and what I have now. However, this tournament reminds me in many ways of Cap D’Agde as I also played there after a long break of 6 weeks. In the first round there, I lost horrendously to Radjabov when I overlooked an obvious tactic. That tournament didn’t turn out too badly for me, so I hope that the same holds true for me here. Today I am Black against Carlsen and white against Svidler, so I will definitely have to play some more enthusiastic chess than I did yesterday. If not, then it’s unlikely I’ll be playing for a shot at winning this rapid tournament.


    1. Keep up the great focus!!!! Congrats on beating Carlsen with Black!! U Rock !!!

    2. FirebrandX

      Yeah Carlsen really blew it at the end there, but it looked like you had him beat in the endgame anyway. In the Game against Svidler as white, It looked like you got into some trouble playing Rg4 instead of Nxf4 first. This allowed Svidler to slip in Re3 and had some good initiative. It seemed he was either content to just draw, or perhaps misplayed the ending there.

    3. droletsky

      Well done! Samourai Nakamura


    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


    * Copy This Password *

    * Type Or Paste Password Here *